Prediction of Bethanie Mattek-Sands [665th] vs Sophie Chang [252nd] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L L L L W L
Form
W W L L L L L L L LHead To Head: Mattek-Sands 1 - 0 Chang
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mattek-Sands winning 2 and Chang winning 0. The last match between Mattek-Sands and Chang was at the Credit One Charleston Open - Charleston, 29-03-2025, Q1 round, Clay with Bethanie Mattek-Sands getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Bethanie Mattek-Sands | 1 |
| Sophie Chang | 0 |
| Mattek-Sands | Stats | Chang |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (1-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 25% (3-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 665 | Ranking | 252 |
| 30 | Highest Rank | 217 |
| 40 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 5 | Titles | 4 |
| 53% (357-314) | Career Total W/L | 50% (270-274) |
| $1,691,151 | Career Prize Money | $45,925 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Mattek-Sands VS Chang H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Player
Sophie Chang
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
10
53%
(
16 of
30)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
47%
(
23 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
Mattek-Sands VS Chang H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 1:5:41 | Average Match Time | 1:5:41 |
| 61% (30/49) | 1st Serve % | 58% (28/48) |
| 53% (16/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 39% (11/28) |
| 53% (10/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 20% (4/20) |
| 78% (7/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (3/8) |
| 69% (33/48) | Return Points Win % | 47% (23/49) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bethanie Mattek-Sands vs Sophie Chang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mattek-Sands 1 - 0 Chang
Editorial Prediction:
When analyzing a tennis clash, several statistics can help us foresee the possible victor. Have you ever pondered how important the performance on the second serve is over recent months? Bethanie Mattek-Sands has notably struggled, earning no points on her second serve, whereas her counterpart, Clare Chang, has secured an impressive 36.65%. There's a significant link between this metric and accurate match predictions, making it a critical factor to consider.
What about the return game — who stands out? Mattek-Sands again falls short, capturing none of her adversaries' second serve points lately, an indicator reinforced by her zero percent return on first serves. In stark contrast, Chang has achieved 51.37% of returns on her opponents' second serves and 31.79% on first serves. Such statistics heavily influence who might be the favorite going into this neck-and-neck confrontation.
In terms of handling pressure, have we seen differences in breakpoint stats? Mattek-Sands has shown vulnerability, saving none of her breakpoints, while Chang has managed to save 42.31%, providing a crucial insight for those considering in-game wagers. A look into their overall match outcomes in the past year reveals even more: Mattek-Sands unfortunately hasn't won any matches, while Chang boasts a win percentage of 50.75%, navigating her way through a 34-33 win/loss record.
How does surface performance factor in? On clay, their most successful surface by percentage, Mattek-Sands achieved a win percentage of 57%, compared to Chang's 54%. Nevertheless, on other surfaces, Mattek-Sands tends to falter more than her rival, especially considering her 51% efficacy on hard surfaces versus Chang's struggles at 27% on grass. These variances could be pivotal.
Faced against formidable foes, who holds the edge? Chang's recent average opponent ranking stands at 376.24, showcasing her experience in grappling with more seasoned competitors compared to Mattek-Sands, who lacks available data. If the match extends into a deciding set, Chang's formidable 56% success rate trumps Mattek-Sands' inability to close any deciding sets over the past year.
Throughout the current event, we see once more the vital signs distinguishing their games. Mattek-Sands has yet to convert a breakpoint, while Chang has capitalized on 39.39% of her opportunities. Each breakpoint chance during the match could prove decisive and influential in live betting calls. Taking these various statistics and performance indicators into account, Clare Chang appears to have a distinct advantage and is likely to emerge victorious in their upcoming encounter.
Bethanie Mattek-Sands Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Shuai Zhang
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
73%
(
64 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
52 of
84)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
28 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
94
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Player
Sophie Chang
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
10
53%
(
16 of
30)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
47%
(
23 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktoria Hruncakova
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
39%
(
26 of
67)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
8
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ksenia Zaytseva
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
74%
(
63 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
90
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
46%
(
19 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danka Kovinic
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Player
Xiaodi You
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lauren Davis
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Sophie Chang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Player
Sophie Chang
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
10
53%
(
16 of
30)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
47%
(
23 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mia Ristic
Player
Sophie Chang
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iva Primorac
Player
Sophie Chang
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Sophie Chang
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
44%
(
19 of
43)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Osuigwe
Player
Sophie Chang
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Whitney Osuigwe
Player
Sophie Chang
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Sophie Chang
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
25%
(
5 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
100%
(
8 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
48%
(
26 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sophie Chang
Player
Chukwumelije Clarke
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
25%
(
5 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
43%
(
21 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sophie Chang
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (357/314) | Win/Loss | 50% (270/274) |
| 53% (834/742) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (627/614) |
| 51% (7505/7150) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (5877/5717) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 966 | Aces Total | 1182 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.43 |
| 1220 | Total Double Faults | 2443 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:14:49 |
| 466.97 | Average Opponent Rank | 492.15 |
| 59% (19018/32398) | 1st Serve % | 59% (16216/27635) |
| 63% (12063/19018) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (10342/16216) |
| 47% (6329/13387) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (4756/11419) |
| 44% (1726/3882) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1546/3227) |
| 44% (14208/32186) | Return Points Win % | 45% (12052/26625) |
| 53% (352/661) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (266/536) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (75/153) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (65/129) |
| 49% (116/239) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (70/161) |
| 83% (368/304) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (281/232) |
| 17% (368/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (281/47) |
| 17% (303/51) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (263/36) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
